Four tools. Real prices, real accuracy, real limits.
Every working writer now runs into the same question: will this draft get flagged as AI? Editors, agencies and SEO clients increasingly ask for a detection score alongside the copy, and some platforms run one automatically before a piece is accepted.
The tools that produce those scores are not equal. Vendors advertise 99% accuracy, but independent tests put most of them 10 to 15 points lower, with false positives that land hardest on plain, formulaic or non-native prose. That gap matters when a score decides whether you get paid.

Plain vocabulary reads as low perplexity and triggers most false positives. Photo: Unsplash
| Vendors claim 99%+; independent tests score 10 to 15 points lower. |
Originality.ai
Publishers, agencies, SEO content

Originality.ai. Image: Originality.ai
| Vendor claim | 99%+ accuracy |
| Independent tests | 76% to 88% overall, 96.7% on paraphrased text, 5.7% false positives |
| Scan output | AI score, plagiarism matches, sentence highlights, shareable report |
| Languages | 50+ (vendor figure) |
| Free access | Trial credits only |
| Site | originality.ai |
Features
- AI detection and plagiarism check in one scan
- Fact checker, readability score, grammar check
- Writing replay that records the drafting process
- Team seats, activity tracking, shareable reports
- Chrome extension for Google Docs and web pages
- API included, 1 credit per 100 words
Pricing
|
Strengths
| Limits
|
GPTZero
Free tier, self-checks, lowest paid entry price

GPTZero sentence highlights and AI gauge. Image: GPTZero
| Vendor claim | 99% accuracy |
| Independent tests | F1 0.94 (highest here), 60% to 80% on humanized text |
| Scan output | Probability score, sentence highlights, AI Vocabulary flags, Writing Report |
| Languages | English plus several others |
| Free access | 10,000 words per month, no card |
| Site | gptzero.me |
Features
- Sentence-level highlighting with overall probability
- Paraphraser Shield for rewritten AI text (paid)
- AI Vocabulary flags overused model words (paid)
- Plagiarism check, batch upload, Chrome extension (paid)
- Writing Report records revision history
- API bundled with Professional plan
Pricing
|
Strengths
| Limits
|
Copyleaks
Multilingual writers, plagiarism plus AI in one report

Copyleaks report with AI score, AI Source Match and AI Phrases. Image: Copyleaks
| Vendor claim | 99.1% accuracy, 0.2% false positives |
| Independent tests | 77% to 96% overall, F1 0.87, 7% to 11% false positives |
| Scan output | AI score, matched sources, flagged AI phrases, downloadable report |
| Languages | 30+ for AI detection, 100+ for plagiarism |
| Free access | 2,500 words per month, no signup needed |
| Site | copyleaks.com |
Features
- Plagiarism engine since 2015, AI detection since 2023
- AI Source Match traces flagged text to published AI pages
- AI Phrases lists wording common in AI text
- Source-code detection
- LMS integrations and API
Pricing
|
Strengths
| Limits
|
Winston AI
Text plus image detection, OCR, PDF reports

Winston AI human score and sentence prediction map. Image: Winston AI
| Vendor claim | 99.98% accuracy |
| Independent tests | 76% to 92% overall, 8% to 10% false positives, weakest on Claude text |
| Scan output | Human score, colour-coded sentence map, readability, PDF report |
| Languages | 12 |
| Free access | 14-day trial, 2,000 credits |
| Site | gowinston.ai |
Features
- Per-sentence prediction map
- AI image and deepfake detection on every plan
- OCR for scanned pages, PDFs and handwriting
- Plagiarism check on Advanced and above
- HUMN-1 human-written certification badge on Advanced and Elite
- Chrome, WordPress, Zapier. API $0.015 per 1,000 words
Pricing
|
Strengths
| Limits
|
Comparison table
Entry price is the annual-billing monthly rate.
| Tool | Free tier | Entry price | Independent accuracy | Plagiarism | Languages | Unique extra |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Originality.ai | Trial credits | $14.95 per month, or $30 one-time | 76% to 88% | Yes | 50+ (vendor) | Fact checker, writing replay |
| GPTZero | 10,000 words per month | $8.33 per month | F1 0.94 | Paid plans | Several | Paraphraser Shield |
| Copyleaks | About 2,500 words per month | $13.99 per month | 77% to 96% | Yes | 30+ AI, 100+ plagiarism | AI Source Match, code detection |
| Winston AI | 14-day trial | $12 per month | 76% to 92% | Advanced tier and up | 12 | Image detection, OCR |
Rules for using a score

Dated drafts beat any percentage in a dispute.
- Run two tools before disputing a score
- Keep version history and dated drafts.
- Expect false positives on plain or ESL prose
- Do not chase 0%; vary sentence length instead.
Which one to pick
Checking your own drafts: GPTZero free, or Essential at $8.33 per month.
Delivering to agencies or SEO clients: Originality.ai, $14.95 per month or $30 one-time.
Multiple languages, plagiarism or code checks: Copyleaks Personal, $13.99 per month.
Images or scanned material: Winston AI Advanced, $19 per month.
Final verdict
GPTZero wins on the three things that matter most to an individual writer. It posted the highest F1 score of the four in head-to-head testing, it gives you 10,000 words a month for free without a card, and its Essential tier is the cheapest paid plan here at $8.33 per month on annual billing. For self-checks before you send a draft, nothing else comes close on cost.
It is not perfect. Its accuracy drops to 60 to 80% on humanized or paraphrased text, and the sentence highlights sometimes disagree with the headline score in the same scan. If you deliver to clients who run their own checks, that inconsistency can cost you an argument.
- GPTZero: best value.
- Originality.ai: best on paraphrased text.
- Copyleaks: 30+ languages and code detection.
- Winston AI: image detection and OCR.
Originality.ai is the pick when the score is part of the deliverable. It scored 96.7% on paraphrased text, produces client-ready shareable reports, and the $30 one-time purchase covers 300,000 words with no subscription. Its higher false-positive rate on formulaic and ESL writing is the trade-off, so keep dated drafts on hand.
Copyleaks earns third place on breadth rather than accuracy. It is the only tool here that covers 30+ languages for AI detection, checks source code, and folds plagiarism into the same report. It also showed the highest ESL false-positive rate in comparative tests, which is a real problem for non-native writers.
Winston AI is a specialist. If your work includes scanned pages, handwriting or images, its OCR and image detection are unique in this group. For plain text it sits mid-pack, tested weakest on Claude output, and has no ongoing free plan.
Whichever you choose, treat the number as a signal, not a ruling. Screen with one tool, confirm with a second, and keep version history for anything a client might question. A dated draft ends more disputes than any percentage.
Discussion 0
More posts
What is a software framework?
A framework is the skeleton your application grows around. This guide explains what that means in practice, how framewor...
Does Grammarly Count as AI Writing?
It runs on AI and has a generative assistant built in, yet millions use it just to catch stray commas. The honest answer...
Can AI Detectors Be Trusted?
What these tools actually measure, where they break, and how much weight their verdicts really deserve.
Please log in or create an account to join the discussion.